Thursday, January 10, 2019

[Scotch Review] Bladnoch 1987 Gordon & Macphail Cask Strength


I’ve been trying a lot of new distilleries lately, my latest is one I’ve been looking at properly reviewing for a while now and what a way to go about it then by trying a cask strength from the much beloved Bladnoch distillery.

A shining star of the southernmost parts of Scotland, Bladnoch was founded in 1817 by the McClelland family. The distillery has lied in Galloway for over 2 centuries and has seen its string of successes and near demise when United Distillers closed it in the 1990s. After 1 failed attempt at a revival from a pair of brothers, it was mothballed in 2008 but sooner then later an Australian businessman named David Prior bought the distillery, becoming the first recorded Aussie to own a Scotch malt distillery, in 2009 and hired beloved Burn Stewart master distiller Ian MacMillan to chief the reborn distillery that re-started spirit production in 2017. So while I’d very much love to try the new Bladnoch spirit that’ll have to wait a long time until I make it to Galloway, until then I’m going to try some Spirit from Bladnoch’s days from when it was owned by United Distillers.

This bottling of Bladnoch from Gordon and Macphail was aged for just over 11 years in some type of oak cask and is bottled at cask strength. I've never had a cask strength Bladnoch before so let's see if this is as much of a beast as the proof gives it compared to some other mature Auchentoshan I've had in the past year.

_____________________________________________________


Age: 11 Years

 

Region: Lowlands

 

Cask Type(s): Oak Cask, Likely 1st or 2nd Fill Bourbon

 

ABV: 58.7%

 

Number of Bottles: Not Available

 

Maturation Time: Dec 1987/Sep 1999


_____________________________________________________

  • Colour: Amber
  • Nose: Brown sugar, light sulphur, apple, lemon citrus, plums, mandarin oranges, grass, floral, hay, barley sugar
  • Palate: Warm Lemons, orange, chocolate, apple sauce, tea tannins, creamy vanilla, lime juice, toasty oak, grass, treenuts
  • Finish: Medium with chocolate peanuts and juicy plums

A really solid young Lowlander. If I was trying this blind I’d have guessed this was Auchentoshan from the brown sugar on the nose and the typical sweet citrus and grass notes on the palate but the touch of sulphur and chocolate really make this a great easy drinking dram even at nearly 59% ABV. A wonderful intro into Bladnoch and definitely worth a try if not a buy at the right price!

85 pts

 

Thanks for reading this review! I'll hopefully be able to post my latest reviews here along with some archived ones I made on reddit over the past few years so make sure to subscribe to my Instagram and Twitter, linked on the about me page on the sidebar, for up to date information on what I'm up to and to see what I might be writing up on next!


Current Review Scoring System:

 

0-49: Horrible

50-59: Bad

60-69: Mediocre to Average

70-74: Average to Good

75-79: Good to Great

80-84: Great to Excellent

85-89: Excellent

90-94: Superb

95+: Masterpiece

 

*Note that all images are owned by their respective owners, The Whisky Laddie does not receive financial compensation for this site's content. If this changes any copyrighted images will be replaced with originals made or solicited by the author of these posts.

Wednesday, January 9, 2019

[Bourbon Review] Blanton's Gold Reserve


I haven’t had much experience with Sazerac’s Blanton’s line of bourbons since I first tried the standard Single Barrel a few years ago. I wasn’t super impressed the first time I tried it and ever since i never really sought out another to review as the only one that looked worthwhile, the Straight From The Barrel, is a non-North American market exclusive. So today I’m reviewing an older Blanton’s bottling from a few years back when the LCBO had it for close to $100 and packs a bit stronger proof.

This Gold version of Blanton's is a special edition available outside the USA in global markets that is hand-filled, sealed, labelled and marked at a hefty 103 proof. So let's see how this compares to the standard Single Barrel.

_____________________________________________________


Age: 4+ Years

 

Region: Kentucky

 

Cask Type(s): Charred American White Oak

 

ABV: 51.5%

 

Number of Bottles: Not Available

 

Maturation Time: Not Available


_____________________________________________________


  • Colour: Amber
  • Nose: Baking spices, apple sauce, vanilla, toasty oak, cane sugar, roasted corn, light cherry, citrus
  • Palate: Allspice, molasses, toffee, caramel apple, grass, tiny bit of rye spice, cherry, vanilla, raisin, medium oak tannin
  • Finish: Medium with toasted cereals and caramel apple loaf

A really dynamic step up from regular Blanton’s, the 51.5% ABV helps this one a lot. The nice fruity and molasses notes help this bourbon shine and the cereal qualities feel well composed and integrated into every part of the whisky which definitely helps this bourbon shine. If you see one around definitely get a bottle if it's the right price.

85 pts

 

Current Review Scoring System:

 

0-49: Horrible

50-59: Bad

60-69: Mediocre to Average

70-74: Average to Good

75-79: Good to Great

80-84: Great to Excellent

85-89: Excellent

90-94: Superb

95+: Masterpiece

 

*Note that all images are owned by their respective owners, The Whisky Laddie does not receive financial compensation for this site's content. If this changes any copyrighted images will be replaced with originals made or solicited by the author of these posts.

 

[Scotch Review] Lagavulin 12 Year Old (2017 Edition)


I haven't had too much Lagavulin to try in my whisky drinking career. It's not like I don't enjoy the distillery, it's just that I haven't had a lot of experiences to enjoy different expressions from this distillery although I'd imagine a couple I have had that were no name Islay independent bottlings were likely Lagavulin juice. So since I'm planning to eventually visit the distillery and try some more Lagavulin in the Fall, today I'm re-visiting some impressions I had on an OB from the distillery that I'd been dying to try for some time before finally getting to it.

This is the 15th edition of the Lagavulin 12 Year Old Cask Strength that released as part of the 2017 Diageo Special Releases. It’s aged entirely in ex-bourbon hogsheads and is bottled at cask strength which sounds like a winning combo to me so let's see how a cask strength OB does compared to the IB Lagavulin I've tried from a while back.

_____________________________________________________


Age: 12 Years

 

Region: Islay

 

Cask Type(s): Refill ex-Bourbon Hogsheads

 

ABV: 56.5%

 

Number of Bottles: Not Available

 

Maturation Time: Bottled in 2017


_____________________________________________________

  • Colour: Light golden
  • Nose: Amazingly Strong nose, sea salt, brine, medicinal nose, mustardseed, vanilla, apple, woodsmoke
  • Palate: Vanilla cream, paprika, wood tannins, medicinal smoke, toasted cereal, apple, cocoa, almond butter
  • Finish: Long with smoky nuts and sweet smoke

Very lovely stuff here. The smoke, sweetness and nuttiness are put together very well and it just goes down well being at cask strength. The cooking spice and buttery aspect helps make this whisky unique as well and while I don't think its as full bodied as Laphroaig 10 Cask Strength, at the least the Batch 7 I tried, I still think for around the same price that it's quite a good priced dram for the most party. Definitely give this one a buy if you can get it at the right price.

85 pts

 

Thanks for reading this review! I'll hopefully be able to post my latest reviews here along with some archived ones I made on reddit over the past few years so make sure to subscribe to my Instagram and Twitter, linked on the about me page on the sidebar, for up to date information on what I'm up to and to see what I might be writing up on next!


Current Review Scoring System:

 

0-49: Horrible

50-59: Bad

60-69: Mediocre to Average

70-74: Average to Good

75-79: Good to Great

80-84: Great to Excellent

85-89: Excellent

90-94: Superb

95+: Masterpiece

 

*Note that all images are owned by their respective owners, The Whisky Laddie does not receive financial compensation for this site's content. If this changes any copyrighted images will be replaced with originals made or solicited by the author of these posts.

 

Tuesday, January 8, 2019

[Bourbon Review] Colonel E.H. Taylor Small Batch Bourbon


Today I'm trying a bottled in bond straight Kentucky bourbon whiskey for the first time. A bottled in bond whiskey is a whiskey that has been aged and bottled according to specific legal regulations. This entails the bourbon to be produced during one distillation season (Jan.-Jun. or Jul.-Dec.), be aged for a minimum of 4 years in a Government bonded warehouse and is bottled at 50% ABV. So if I'm trying my first BiB why not start with an interesting one?

This Colonel E.H. Taylor comes from Buffalo Trace distillery and is named after Colonel Edmund Haynes Taylor Jr. who is a pioneer of sorts in the bourbon industry but is also known as the grand nephew of US President Zachary Taylor, one of the shortest lived Presidents who died just a year into his term from cholera. It retails in Ontario, Canada now for $99 CAD which is slightly up from $90 which was the retail price last year before those nasty tariffs and hikes kicked in!

_____________________________________________________


Age: 4+ Years

 

Region: Kentucky

 

Cask Type(s): Charred American White Oak

 

ABV: 50%

 

Number of Bottles: Not Available

 

Maturation Time: Not Available


_____________________________________________________

  • Colour: Amber
  • Nose: Strong baking spices, toasty oak, apple, vanilla fluff, tannin, toffee, Strong cereal with a touch of ryespice
  • Palate: Strong caramel cream, vanilla, oak, apple, baking spices, cocoa powder, lemon citrus
  • Finish: Medium with spiced almonds and apple jam

Pretty solid stuff, nothing off-putting or out of the ordinary and the sweet and spicy elements work well for a young bourbon. However, for the price of $90 here in Canada I think there are better options at barrel proof that exist where I wouldn’t buy this whisky and am quite content with this inexpensive dram.

80 pts

 

Thanks for reading this review! I'll hopefully be able to post my latest reviews here along with some archived ones I made on reddit over the past few years so make sure to subscribe to my Instagram and Twitter, linked on the about me page on the sidebar, for up to date information on what I'm up to and to see what I might be writing up on next!


Current Review Scoring System:

 

0-49: Horrible

50-59: Bad

60-69: Mediocre to Average

70-74: Average to Good

75-79: Good to Great

80-84: Great to Excellent

85-89: Excellent

90-94: Superb

95+: Masterpiece

 

*Note that all images are owned by their respective owners, The Whisky Laddie does not receive financial compensation for this site's content. If this changes any copyrighted images will be replaced with originals made or solicited by the author of these posts.

[Scotch Review] Strathmill 1991 Gordon and Macphail Connoisseur's Choice


Happy 2019! I haven't been updating my blog lately and hopefully want to backlog my old reviews so I can update this site a bit more for the year so I'm going back to an old review of a bottle that I won at an auction here in Toronto a few years prior!

When I bought this young Strathmill I discovered that this was quite an old release of the distillery through the Gordon and Macphail independent bottling company that hasn't been in the LCBO since 2002. When it was in the LCBO it retailed for just under $40. Strathmill is a small distillery owned by Diageo and it primarily makes malt whisky for the Justerini and Brooks blended scotch whisky. It became a distillery out of the remains of a corn mill in 1891 during the 1890s scotch boom and is one of the 3 distilleries lying in Keith, the other two being Strathisla and Glen Keith who are owned by Chivas. The distillery produces 1.8 million liters of whisky out of 2 wash stills and 2 spirit stills every year which pretty much solely goes into blends. Strathmill has only produced 1 distillery bottling (apparently) in recent memory which was a 12 year old Flora and Fauna series release by Diageo that was very much panned by some reviewers on this sub.

However this single malt is not a distillery bottling, it is an independent bottling by Gordon and Macphail under the Connoisseurs Choice label and is bottled with no color added at 40% ABV. What's also interesting is that this single malt was distilled during Strathmill's 100th birthday so in a way this is definitely a celebratory whisky for a little known distillery so lets take a look and see what it has to offer.

_____________________________________________________


Age: 10 Years

 

Region: Speyside

 

Cask Type(s): Oak Cask, assuming ex-Bourbon

 

ABV: 40%

 

Number of Bottles: Not Available

 

Maturation Time: 1991/2002


_____________________________________________________

  • Color: Dark amber
  • Nose: Vanilla, citrus, sweet oak, raisin, woodspice
  • Taste: Apples, vanilla, grapes, nice amount of cinnamon, ginger, grass
  • Finish: Long with smoky fruits, treenuts and honey

Didn't expect too much from this being 40% but wow is this some surprisingly solid juice. It's not going to WOW you by any means but this is a really great whisky. Its not excellent but it comes very close, would love to try Strathmill at cask strength someday.

75 pts

 

Thanks for reading this review! I'll hopefully be able to post my latest reviews here along with some archived ones I made on reddit over the past few years so make sure to subscribe to my Instagram and Twitter, linked on the about me page on the sidebar, for up to date information on what I'm up to and to see what I might be writing up on next!


Current Review Scoring System:

 

0-49: Horrible

50-59: Bad

60-69: Mediocre to Average

70-74: Average to Good

75-79: Good to Great

80-84: Great to Excellent

85-89: Excellent

90-94: Superb

95+: Masterpiece

 

*Note that all images are owned by their respective owners, The Whisky Laddie does not receive financial compensation for this site's content. If this changes any copyrighted images will be replaced with originals made or solicited by the author of these posts.